Where the turf is more environmentally friendly, except in the case of “non-functional turf”


It goes into a dry state and leaves the grass. Nevada Governor Steve Sisolak just signed Bill AB356 By 2027, all “non-functioning lawns” should be removed from the Las Vegas Valley. This effort will save about 10 percent of the Colorado River region’s annual water allocation. “Now is a really good time to announce this,” said Röling, who was part of a bipartisan coalition including the South Nevada Housing Construction Association, which supported the bill.

The South Nevada Water Department has yet to form a committee that actually defines a “non-functioning lawn”. So far, this category has roughly described the thousands of acres of grass that cover the meridians of roads, office parks, and housing in the area, making up about a third of all grass in the area. I go.

“The best way to explain this is the type of grass that is only used when someone is pushing the mower over it,” Roerink said. “The other abbreviation that was commonly used during this legislative session was” useless grass. (Parks, schools, golf courses, secluded lawns, and other seemingly useful grasses are still allowed, at least for now.)

“Terf who does not work” – the phrase itself is an existential knot. Is it wordy or oxymoron? In any case, it completely sums up our distorted relationship with nature. Some herbs are good, some are bad, and all of them (except those that grow naturally in the prairies) are designed and managed by us.

The challenge is not the excess of weed, but the excess of people. Southern Nevada has seen explosive growth in recent years, with water use increasing by more than 9% since 2018. Eliminating “unnecessary” grass was a good first step, Roerink said, but feared. that water savings do not simply translate. In the debate for the new development (more useful and arguably grass).



Source link

Comments are closed.